Sunday, 31 August 2014

New York broadcaster picks up where Aereo left off with new Tablet TV service

New York broadcaster picks up where Aereo left off with new Tablet TV service

Broadcasters fought tooth and nail against Aereo because they wanted to retain control of their content, but no one ever said the TV-streaming service wasn't a good idea.


Now one broadcaster, New York's Granite Broadcasting Corp., is taking up Aereo's mantle before its body is even in the ground - albeit with a slightly different model.


Granite, which operates 14 stations across the US, has teamed up with London tech company Motive Television to launch Tablet TV, a service that - duh - transmits live TV content to iOS and Android tablets.


Tablet TV is deploying first in San Francisco, with other cities to follow, according to cable newsletter FierceCable.


T-Pod touch


So what makes Tablet TV different from Aereo's service, which the Supreme Court deemed to be illegal?


Simple: whereas Aereo charged users a subscription fee to broadcast live TV directly to their tablets, laptops and other devices, Tablet TV requires them to buy their own antenna, called a T-Pod.


The rechargeable T-Pod picks up over-the-air TV signals and transmits them to tablets that are physically within 100 feet of it.


Granted, Aereo did survive for a while on the argument that its subscribers were in fact renting individual antennae that just happened to be located at Aereo locations around the country, but that ultimately didn't hold up.


Tablet TV's service also includes a chat client and channel guide, and lets users change channels with a swipe. It sounds like it could be useful for some, and it shouldn't run into any legal issues if Granite Broadcasting Corp. sticks to streaming its own content.

















http://ift.tt/1pyXK1M

Sky Sports News HQ comes to Now TV

Sky Sports News HQ comes to Now TV

With the Premier League transfer deadline just days away this is arguably one of the most important times for football fans to keep up with sports news, and for anyone with a NOW TV Box it's getting a little easier to do just that.


There's now a dedicated Sky Sports News HQ app available for the device and you don't even need to have a Sports Pass to use it, though you do need a Sky pass of some kind, be it movies, sports or entertainment.


If you have a Sky Sports Day Pass or Sky Sports Week Pass then you'll also be able to keep watching Sky Sports News HQ for 30 days after it's expired.


Cheap entertainment


If you don't already have a Now TV Box you can get one for just £9.99 and we were rather fond of it in our review, though while it includes key Sky services along with the likes of 4oD and iPlayer, it inevitably lacks Netflix and Amazon Prime Instant Video in an attempt to push Sky's own movie streaming service on you.





http://ift.tt/1u61gzY

New York broadcaster picks up where Aereo left off with new Tablet TV service

New York broadcaster picks up where Aereo left off with new Tablet TV service

Broadcasters fought tooth and nail against Aereo because they wanted to retain control of their content, but no one ever said the TV-streaming service wasn't a good idea.


Now one broadcaster, New York's Granite Broadcasting Corp., is taking up Aereo's mantle before its body is even in the ground - albeit with a slightly different model.


Granite, which operates 14 stations across the US, has teamed up with London tech company Motive Television to launch Tablet TV, a service that - duh - transmits live TV content to iOS and Android tablets.


Tablet TV is deploying first in San Francisco, with other cities to follow, according to cable newsletter FierceCable.


T-Pod touch


So what makes Tablet TV different from Aereo's service, which the Supreme Court deemed to be illegal?


Simple: whereas Aereo charged users a subscription fee to broadcast live TV directly to their tablets, laptops and other devices, Tablet TV requires them to buy their own antenna, called a T-Pod.


The rechargeable T-Pod picks up over-the-air TV signals and transmits them to tablets that are physically within 100 feet of it.


Granted, Aereo did survive for a while on the argument that its subscribers were in fact renting individual antennae that just happened to be located at Aereo locations around the country, but that ultimately didn't hold up.


Tablet TV's service also includes a chat client and channel guide, and lets users change channels with a swipe. It sounds like it could be useful for some, and it shouldn't run into any legal issues if Granite Broadcasting Corp. sticks to streaming its own content.

















http://ift.tt/1u3c6GU

Apple reportedly considering expensive iWatch price, multiple models

Apple reportedly considering expensive iWatch price, multiple models

There's been plenty of speculation over what the iWatch will ultimately cost, but a new report claims to have some inside information.


According to Re/code, which has been the source of multiple iWatch rumors lately, Apple has considered charging as much as $400 (about £240, AU$430) for the top-of-the-line iWatch model.


Yes, that also indicates that Apple will release multiple models of its wearable, which shouldn't come as a surprise but hasn't previously been discussed.


If $400 is the high-end iWatch price, then it stands to reason there will be versions with lower price tags as well, possibly with fewer features, less internal storage or inferior specs.


Cutting it close


Strangely the site's sources say that Apple hasn't yet decided on final pricing. That's cutting it pretty close if the iWatch is debuting at Apple's iPhone 6 event on September 9.


Then again, even if the iWatch debuts in September it might not release until 2015, according to a previous report from Re/code - in which case it would make sense for Apple not to have the price down yet.


In any case $400 is a lot to pay in the smartwatch space, where most of Apple's would-be competitors don't even come close to that price tag.


But Apple iFans are used to paying more for their favorite devices, and there's no doubt that Apple knows what it's doing.

















http://ift.tt/1wWInUE

In depth: Forget IM: why email is still the ultimate form of online communication

In depth: Forget IM: why email is still the ultimate form of online communication

Why email has endured


Young people don't use email. Everyone hates their never-ending inbox. The likes of WhatsApp, Twitter and SnapChat are gaining in popularity. But does all that really mean that email is dead?


For many of us, email is the internet's 'killer app', a neutral, open innovation of the kind it no longer seems capable of creating. It may have first been used in 1971 and it can seem woefully outdated, but email isn't going anywhere.


In an uncertain world where the internet may already be full, email is the one thing we can rely on. It has stamina that new communication platforms can only dream of.


"Email has staying power because it has continued to evolve over the past three decade," says Paul Leprévost, Frontend Developer at Mailjet. "It's a trusted source, as most people have an email address and see it as a reliable channel for sending and receiving messages."


The write stuff


Who still uses email? Well, everyone on the internet... and counting. The Radicati Group report that the number of worldwide email accounts will grow from over 4.1 billion today to 5.2 billion in 2018, with email users increasing from over 2.5 billion now to over 2.8 billion.


The workplace is obsessed with email; The Radicati Group reports that the 108.7 billion emails sent by businesses each day will increase to 139.4 billion by 2018. Simply put, email is massive.


"Email will not be replaced for the foreseeable future," says Dr Peter Chadha, Founder of DrPete and co-author of Thinking of...Going Google Apps – To Save Money and Get Ahead – A guide for SMEs. It has replaced the letter as a format of choice for formal relationships, and until the millennials enter the working environment I can't see that any other forms of communication will replace it."


There is a tiny chink in email's armour; the increase in non-business email usage is slowing, with the 87.8 billion personal emails sent each day estimated to grow to 'only' 88.3 billion by 2018. The culprit? Instant messaging (IM).


email


What about social media & IM?


Unlike email, not everyone on the internet uses the same system. Social media sites Facebook (1.32 billion), Twitter (500 million accounts), Google+ (340 million), Tumblr (150 million), LinkedIn (200 million), Instagram (100 million) dominate, but there are countless others around the world, such as WhatsApp, SnapChat, Skype, Japan's Line, South Korea's KakaoTalk and China's WeChat. IM is part of all of them.


What's your IM of choice? Depends on who you're communicating with, right? Perhaps you send text messages with close friends, and use either Facebook Messenger or WhatsApp with wider circle of friends, use Google Hangouts with colleagues and Microsoft Lync with clients.


It's a sector in flux. "We are still in the Wild West as far as IM goes," says Chadha. "There is no huge brand name behind them all and no real de facto standard."


email


Isn't IM a killer app on mobile?


Email is integrated into all modern mobile OS so perfectly that it's arguably easier to access than anything else. Litmus reported in October that a staggering 48% of emails are opened on smartphones and tablets while mobile email users worldwide number 897 million, according to The Radicati Group.


OK, so that's nothing when you consider that 73.44 percent of Facebook's total user base now accesses the service from a mobile device, but in terms of numbers, email wins again. Why else would Facebook have devised its own email addresses?


Who doesn't use email?


Unquestioning eyes might look at the figures and see a demographic time-bomb underneath email. "There is no point in emailing students any more," Professor Sir Steve Smith, the vice-chancellor of Exeter University, told The Times in May. "They get in touch with us by social media, especially Twitter, and we've had to employ people to reply that way. Students will tweet for help if something has gone wrong."


The may be a new generation who rely on social media and IM, and hardly use email, but there are far more internet users that rely far more on email. Besides, those students will soon be in jobs where email is the accepted norm. How else does one send attachments and retrieve old messages?


email


Who thinks email is dead?


The cloud crowd, those Silicon Valley types who, as well as being young and therefore not emotionally tied to email, can't see any way to make money from anything that already exists. The argument from these guys is that productivity is suffering in the workplace (which just happens to have a collectively massive IT budget).


"If businesses rely solely on email, they run the risk of silo'ing knowledge into individual departments and restricting cross practice creativity that can otherwise be harnessed on wider enterprise collaboration platforms," says Wim Stoop, Senior Product Marketing Manager at Jive Software.


Some complain that email is a time-sink, but there are ways around that. One of the best – and simplest – tricks comes from Unroll.Me; sign-up and your email account is searched, revealing all of your distracting daily subscriptions (it found a staggering 317 in mine). After you've thinned them out, Unroll.Me then consolidates the others, sending you one single daily email called The Rollup containing all of your subscriptions.


Stoop still thinks email, and even IM, are doomed in the long run. "Technology in the workplace should and will go beyond IM and email, empowering employees to innovate collaboratively," he says.


email


"Virtual workplaces" and centralised communications


Despite email's resilience as a communication tool, the bulging work inbox is the bane of many an office worker's life. "An oversized inbox is a daunting prospect and with technology increasingly available that can boost productivity and dramatically reduce email volume, a change in the way businesses communicate is ahead," says Jon Jorgenson, group director from Access Group.


"The email might not be dead, but the frequency in which it is relied upon may be under threat." Though he admits that there will always be a place for email in the business world, Jorgenson thinks that we're going to start to see a shift toward using technology that can replace emails with more time effective ways of communicating.


"Enterprise cloud communication tools provide ways of allowing people to communicate as they would on email through perpetual messaging," he says, "bringing together elements of instant messaging, group chat and online communities into a group messaging application for businesses."


Myriad new platforms are emerging that try to make email more like social media, with the likes of HipChat, Trello, Salesforce.com, Yammer, Convo and Slack all attempting to replace internal email with a platform that lets employees message each other, share stuff and chat. Slack – the creation of an ex-Flickr co-founder – even has its own Wall of Love on Twitter.


"We've recently started using Slack, and it's the closest anybody has come so far to a viable replacement for email," says Jon Norris, Web editor at Crunch Accounting.


"It's faster, more collaborative, and integrates nicely with lots of our third-party apps. I'd estimate it's saving us at least a few hours a day already." However, there's a catch. "We can't switch over to Slack wholesale as everybody outside our organisation is still using email." That's not going to change anytime soon because very few of us even work in the kind of corporate office environment where such software is available.


Email


How the inbox is changing


"In the long-term I can see email becoming more of an invisible protocol that various specialised apps use to send data to one another, rather than the raw communication layer it is now – we're already seeing the beginnings of this with Google's new Gmail API – and I'm all in favour," says Norris.


The evolution of email has been a constant in the life of the internet. Gmail has its Priority inbox, whereby all circulars go under one tab, and all personal email into another.


Apple has plans to introduce Mail Drop, which lets users choose to send large attachments through iCloud instead of through their recipients' email servers, while Outlook now integrates social media. The email inbox is fast becoming a hub, which shouldn't come as a surprise; wasn't email the original social media? The inbox is becoming a smartbox.


Task-orientated app for smartphones, Mailbox – now owned by Dropbox – was a huge hit a year or so ago, so there's obviously a demand for new kinds of email. Baydin's Boomerang is a productivity plugin for Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo that adds scheduled messaging and the ability to send an email off into the ether, only for it to return at a specified (less busy) time.


"As the email experience has continued to improve … it's clear that email's days are not numbered," says Leprévost, citing how the Mailbox app has created slick email on mobiles.


"Since email is constantly evolving, the email we know today will likely not be the email we know ten years from now – expect to see new hardware and software developed that changes the communication experience, particularly with wearables."


Email, the internet's most trusted brand, has plenty of mileage left in it yet.
















http://ift.tt/1wW4NWa

Inflame: Smartwatches are everywhere, so why are they still winding people up?

Inflame: Smartwatches are everywhere, so why are they still winding people up?

The big smatwatch wind up


LG and Samsung have released so many types of smartwatch of late you'd think everyone on the planet had at least eight arms - and that people actually cared about smartwatches.


Although this week in smartwatch news, things did get a little interesting. LG discovered a new kind of shape. It's a bit like a wheel, sort of curved at the edges, and looks round. The press release said it was a Circle(TM).


The LG G Watch R, complete with a serious-looking diver's watch face, converted quite a few Moto 360 fans to LG's wearable cause in a flash, although debate turned to how exactly LG's engineers manage to manipulate the bezel to mask the corners of the square display beneath. Some people felt they're being ripped off by having the corner of the square screen hidden from them, which is a little odd.


Samsung also announced its Samsung Gear S this week, a smartwatch that curves along the other axis, bending around the wrist like a bracelet. Ideal for all those top fashion models who fancy trying out the Tizen OS.


But is any of this enough to convince the world that a watch with a battery that only lasts a day or two, and functions like a stripped-down version of the mobile phones we already own, is a good idea?


Normalised


Looking quite like a normal watch is a strange selling point for a gadget, what with normal watches that look exactly like watches not exactly short on the ground.


Beneath a piece on The Verge in which a writer spent 529 words saying he didn't like the look of LG's latest watch-like smartwatch very much, reader Wingzero0 hit incisiveness gold with: "If nothing else, it'll give Apple a template on what people like and don't like and they can go from there."


After some tedious back-and-forth about Nexus 5 battery life and fights about who's a stupid fan of what, discussion returned to the standard watch and the status these ancient, non-smart wearables once inferred on the wearer.


After someone claimed no proper watch enthusiast would consider a smartwatch, reader Pyrolys replied with: "Sorry, but you don't get watches. The 'rebirth' of the automatic watch is due to the renewed interest of people in the craftsmanship it involves. Phones have never been about that."


Reader Decmir is also on the side of things that tick because of cogs rather than due to speakers, saying: "It's OK to buy a new phone every two years. It's also OK to die wearing the watch you were offered at twenty. Personally I'll stick to analogue timepieces!"


Bottom gear


Meanwhile, Samsung's tech announcement of the week was the Gear S, the Tizen-powered gadget it's using to target the sporty crowd. On the Guardian, no one was impressed by its size, with even this second-generation of slightly slimmer, curvier screens not going down too well.


Commenter Nuspeak said: "I think they are all too big, too ugly and with too poor battery life. I think we are a number of generations, possibly 2-3 years away from something that will break the mass market."


To which ageing reader SugarPlumpFairy replied: "Remember the first digital watches in the 70s? They were huge; you had to lift your wrist with your other hand to see the time. I'm sure I still have one shoulder higher than the other."


Reader Threlly thinks Samsung and LG are simply pumping this stuff out there now before Apple steps up and owns the market, posting: "I sense a rush to get products out before Apple come along on the 9th and crush them like bugs."


Rotate wrist toward face and wink to activate time-telling feature


Apple Insider poked its nose in again this week, using the Samsung and LG launches as a way to get its readers slagging them both off to create a riot of page impressions.


Reader Nagromme doesn't seem to think that even Apple can solve the issues currently dogging the wearables scene, though, belittling the devices with his questions: "Screen always visible (without weird twitches or gestures) or not? Battery life for days, or not? If those don't have good answers, then chasing the 'watch' concept is barking up the wrong tree."


Perhaps some sort of kinetic self-charging option might be an option? Imagine the amount of physical activity the wearer would need to get up to in order to keep a smartwatch charged. It could single-handedly end the obesity crisis.


Reader jkichline, meanwhile, is not overly won over by Samsung's wearable aesthetic, saying: "I'm not sure who Samsung is designing for. Buzz Lightyear perhaps? Does it come with a laser weapon too?"


Later, better, more productive


And what of the so-called iWatch itself? Beneath a Gizmodo thing about the trillions of vague rumours and Apple wearable patents that have popped up of late, the knives are already out and attempting to dent the iWatch's rumoured sapphire glass display.


Reader Jonny Smyth leapt in with both feet, commenting cynically: "It'll be overpriced, underpowered and totally not worth it, but the Apple fanboys will defend it anyway."


To which The Artgineer responded: "People will claim it's overpriced, underpowered and totally not worth it before it's even announced, if it even exists."


Commenter The Terminator doubts smartwatches will ever become popular, as their features won't have the same timeless appeal of their non-smart forefathers.


He commented: "A deal breaker for me would be a non-replaceable battery. Unlike mobile phones, watches are meant to last the test of time (no pun intended) as they represent fashion and have a nostalgic appeal. They're not meant to be thrown out with every new iteration."


This is presumably why Apple's not done one yet. What's the benefit to a tech company in making a gadget that you don't have to replace with a new one every 18 months?

















http://ift.tt/1neand4

Saturday, 30 August 2014

Updated: iOS 8 release date, news and features

Cable companies want the FCC to squash local cities' own networks

Cable companies want the FCC to squash local cities' own networks

Local governments in two US cities have taken the internet into their own hands, building high-speed networks for their residents to use.


And broadband association USTelecom - which represents Comcast, Time Warner and other internet providers - is determined to stop them.


It's not just that residents whose municipalities provide internet for them are no longer subject to Comcast and TW's horrible and pricey service; it's that these governments can't be trusted to do it right, USTelecom said.


And now it's petitioned the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to stop progress in its tracks.


Haven't heard that one before


Specifically the broadband association wants the FCC to deny petitions filed by the cities of Wilson, North Carolina and Chattanooga, Tennessee asking the Commission to override state laws that could make those cities' own broadband networks illegal.


"States are well within their rights to impose these restrictions, given the potential impact on taxpayers if public projects are not carefully planned and weighed against existing private investment," USTelecom Senior Vice President of Communications Anne Veigle wrote in an official blog post.


"The success of public broadband is a mixed record, with numerous examples of failures," she continued. "With state taxpayers on the financial hook when a municipal broadband network goes under, it is entirely reasonable for state legislatures to be cautious in limiting or even prohibiting that activity."


At least she admits that the association is calling on the FCC to block cities' broadband expansion for that "and other reasons." Wonder what those other reasons could be?

















http://ift.tt/1qeE9CT