Oculus VR and its founder Palmer Luckey are facing a very real lawsuit for allegedly stealing and misappropriating virtual reality trade secrets as well as infringing on copyrights and trademarks.
The suit was filed by game publisher ZeniMax Media and its subsidiary id Software, the former employer of Oculus CTO John Carmack. ZeniMax had already started airing out accusations related to Luckey, Carmack and unauthorized code use earlier this month.
In a press release today, ZeniMax and id claimed Oculus VR and Luckey unlawfully exploited "intellectual property, including trade secrets, copyrighted computer code, and technical know-how relating to virtual reality technology that was developed by ZeniMax after years of research and investment."
It's ZeniMax intellectual property that "has provided the fundamental technology driving the Oculus Rift since its inception," the release stated. Despite requests for compensation, ZeniMax says Oculus VR and Luckey have "refused" and continue using its IP without permission.
What the lawsuit means for the future of Oculus Rift and other virtual headsets Oculus may have in development isn't clear, namely because none of the parties are talking specifics.
Where does Oculus Rift stand?
TechRadar asked ZeniMax, Oculus VR and Facebook (which bought Oculus for $2 billion in March) for comment on the lawsuit. We've yet to hear from ZeniMax and a Facebook spokesperson said the social network declines to comment. However, an Oculus spokesman sent us the following statement:
"The lawsuit filed by ZeniMax has no merit whatsoever. As we have previously said, ZeniMax did not contribute to any Oculus technology. Oculus will defend these claims vigorously."
ZeniMax didn't say what it's seeking in monetary compensation but it has asked for a jury trial in US federal court. We asked the firm whether it's seeking a halt to development and/or eventual consumer sales of the Oculus Rift, but again, we haven't heard from the company.
As for Oculus, it had nothing more to share outside its statement, including what the lawsuit could mean for its VR hardware moving forward.
http://ift.tt/1tlZZnF
No comments:
Post a Comment